Question: What would adopting RFID do to
our cost structure?
Our Advice: Many people argue that RFID
will raise operating costs, but "not if you learn to substitute information for
inventory." Back in 1983, an upstart retail chain named Wal-Mart spent two
cents of each dollar of sales on getting goods to its stores, versus a nickel
for Kmart, the discount market leader at the time. [In Sam We Trust, a
chronicle of retail competition by former Wall Street Journal writer Bob
Ortega.] Within seven years, Wal-Mart had leveraged that three-cent advantage
to overtake Kmart in total revenue.
The short answer is that every company, and even individual facilities within a
company, has its own leverage points where more specific, accurate, and timely
information can improve economics -- that's what RFID is all about. At one
manufacturing client, we found an opportunity to reduce trailer-loading and
pull-away time by about 15 minutes per order by implementing an RFID-based
trailer-loading system to eliminate manual verification and to communicate with
yard drivers automatically as trailers fill. For this facility, the
improvements represent a 20% increase in shipping capacity. More capacity means
less need for additional facilities as the company grows -- hence less people,
rent, and inventory.
The long answer is that effectively adopting a new, disruptive technology
like RFID requires rethinking business processes and long-time operating rules.
RFID Profit Points
To profit from RFID, three practices are essential:
-
Scope RFID projects to achieve a wider range of benefits. RFID
technology can improve speed, accuracy, and security (Gen 2) while generating
robust data for business analysis. With these attributes in mind, challenge
existing business rules and process models. We employ our own variant of Lean
Six Sigma methodologies to surface opportunities for improvement.
-
Determine the right starting point and ramp-up strategy for adoption. This
point is the absolutely essential corollary to (1). It's hard to generate good
ROI if you spend too much on the front-end of a project. Ramp-up also is
critical; your level of business impact is dependent on cascading your solution
across processes and facilities after it's proven successful.
-
Deploy an RFID IT architecture that's scalable, and provides low total cost of
ownership. Many companies think of RFID as just an item identifier, like
bar codes. RFID is far more than an item identifier; it's really a
business-event identifier, and one that can broadcast this information wherever
it's needed -- e.g., real-time notice of success or failure. Once one begins to
think this way, the importance of re-examining the company's IT architecture
becomes obvious -- high volumes and urgent need for information.
Strategically minded companies are unlikely to see the "cost" of RFID forcing
them to raise prices. Shortsighted competitors won't be as fortunate.
--Walt DuLaney
What would adopting RFID do to
our cost structure?
How could RFID change the way
products are sourced, delivered, or sold in our industry?
What should IT managers know
about the Defense Department's regulations on RFID that take effect this month?
Previously, you said
that RFID wasn't yet ready
for widespread adoption. Is it now?
How should we manage differently after
adopting RFID?
Can RFID help my company win new
business?
If we delay implementing RFID,
will it really cause us to lose business with a major RFID-mandating
customer?
What security issues do
we need to consider in using RFID?
What do we need to do to adopt
RFID effectively, and to position the company strategically to get positive
financial returns from our RFID investments?
|